"Judd runs the Starlight Hotel out in some sort of swampy place, and is unfortunately a few slices short of a loaf. He has a crocodile conveniently placed on the other side of the front porch railing. The croc will eat just about anything, as the hapless guests of the hotel find out soon enough. A reformed hooker, an unlucky family, and the father and sister of the hooker all suffer various rates of attrition as Judd tries to implement damage control."
Bonomonomo Moderator
Posts : 282 Join date : 2008-04-10 Location : Hollyweird
See my post in Funhouse. Another awesome Hooper film.
Quoted and fixed for truth
Wrong Hooper's only good movies are TCM, Salem's Lot and Poltergeist. That's it. Eaten Alive and Funhouse are uninspired generic POSs!
WRONG!!!
Bonomo FTF...again.
INVADERS FROM MARS, TCM 2, LIFEFORCE, and EATEN ALIVE & FUNHOUSE]= Fun as as fuck.
ESPECIALLY TCM 2.
Bonomonomo Moderator
Posts : 282 Join date : 2008-04-10 Location : Hollyweird
Subject: Re: EATEN ALIVE (1977) Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:09 am
dolemike wrote:
Bonomonomo wrote:
Disturbed Dan wrote:
Bonomonomo wrote:
See my post in Funhouse. Another awesome Hooper film.
Quoted and fixed for truth
Wrong Hooper's only good movies are TCM, Salem's Lot and Poltergeist. That's it. Eaten Alive and Funhouse are uninspired generic POSs!
WRONG!!!
Bonomo FTF...again.
INVADERS FROM MARS, TCM 2, LIFEFORCE, and EATEN ALIVE & FUNHOUSE]= Fun as as fuck.
ESPECIALLY TCM 2.
TCM2 is amusing, but fails at rewatchability!
dolemike Admin
Posts : 528 Join date : 2008-04-10
Subject: Re: EATEN ALIVE (1977) Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:00 am
dolemike wrote:
Bonomonomo wrote:
Disturbed Dan wrote:
Bonomonomo wrote:
See my post in Funhouse. Another awesome Hooper film.
Quoted and fixed for truth
Wrong Hooper's only good movies are TCM, Salem's Lot and Poltergeist. That's it. Eaten Alive and Funhouse are uninspired generic POSs!
WRONG!!!
Bonomo FTF...again.
INVADERS FROM MARS, TCM 2, LIFEFORCE, and EATEN ALIVE & FUNHOUSE]= Fun as as fuck.
ESPECIALLY TCM 2.
You and that 'rewatchability' shit.
If a flick is satisfying enough the first time. it's done it's job well enough, but how do you know it fails at rewatchability if you never bother to watch it again?
BFTF.
Bonomonomo Moderator
Posts : 282 Join date : 2008-04-10 Location : Hollyweird
Subject: Re: EATEN ALIVE (1977) Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:22 am
Cuz...I tried to rewatch it...and couldn't it was boring as hell. Sorry. I think films should be rewatchable if they're good. If a film fails on the second try it wasn't a good film to begin with.
Cuz...I tried to rewatch it...and couldn't it was boring as hell. Sorry. I think films should be rewatchable if they're good. If a film fails on the second try it wasn't a good film to begin with.
You're telling me that you're so easily fooled into believing a movie is good the 1st time that it takes you 2 trys to find out it sucks???
And you want people to read your reviews?
Bonomonomo Moderator
Posts : 282 Join date : 2008-04-10 Location : Hollyweird
I give a film a lot of credit because I'm paying attention to every little detail while it's running the first time. I sit back and relax the second time, but if I'm falling asleep the movie failed to be entertaining. At least Blacula, while not the best, has great replayability.